首页 vps测评 bandwagonhost简单测评-(512m内存/年付9.9刀)!

bandwagonhost简单测评-(512m内存/年付9.9刀)!

主机测评在8月9日晚十一点做买了一款bandwagonhost的VPS,想把这款VPS的一些数据分享给大家,于是就随性想到哪里就写到哪里,有兴趣的凑合着看!先说下这款VPS的参数:基于openvz(2代),512M保障内存,512M vswap,5G硬盘,带宽这个有讲究(incoming:1G,out:100M),CPU默认说的是给1core但是你拿到手后会发现实则是2core(Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz | 频率:1134.000 | 二级缓存:8192 KB | Bogomips:4533.95 ×2)。bandwagonhost探针:http://162.211.225.146/p.php [bandwagonhost-512m内存/5g硬盘/500g流量/年付9.99美元 ]

bandwagonhost简单测评-(512m内存/年付9.9刀)!

主机测评在8月9日晚十一点做买了一款bandwagonhost的VPS,想把这款VPS的一些数据分享给大家,于是就随性想到哪里就写到哪里,有兴趣的凑合着看!先说下这款VPS的参数:基于openvz(2代),512M保障内存,512M vswap,5G硬盘,带宽这个有讲究(incoming:1G,out:100M),CPU默认说的是给1core但是你拿到手后会发现实则是2core(Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz | 频率:1134.000 | 二级缓存:8192 KB | Bogomips:4533.95 ×2)。bandwagonhost探针:http://162.211.225.146/p.php [bandwagonhost-512m内存/5g硬盘/500g流量/年付9.99美元 ]

bandwagonhost的VPS管理采用的是KiwiVM面板,不像solusvm那样给出一个后台管理网址你登陆上去就行,这里需要你登陆官方网站,按照下面步骤:
bandwagonhost简单测评-(512m内存/年付9.9刀)!

点击下图里面的login to kiwivm panel就可以登陆管理面板了:

bandwagonhost简单测评-(512m内存/年付9.9刀)!

西面是kiwivm管理面板截图,一些关键点我说明了,差不多有这些功能就足够你用了,有句名言说“Less is more” !

bandwagonhost简单测评-(512m内存/年付9.9刀)!

下面是主机测评我在晚上十二点三十多份的样子本机下载测速(广州联通6M ADSL)

bandwagonhost简单测评-(512m内存/年付9.9刀)!

电信线路追踪(主机测评自己购买的一个他们家的凤凰城的VPS:162.211.225.146):
|——————————————————————————————|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host – % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|————————————————|——|——|——|——|——|——|
| No response from host – 100 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host – 100 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 219.136.206.97 – 0 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 113.98.75.98 – 0 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| 183.56.31.17 – 0 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| 61.144.3.30 – 0 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 202.97.34.202 – 0 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 79 | 122 | 118 |
| 202.97.60.197 – 0 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 202.97.58.222 – 0 | 10 | 10 | 173 | 174 | 180 | 176 |
| 202.97.90.134 – 0 | 10 | 10 | 161 | 162 | 164 | 164 |
| 10gigabitethernet10-6.core1.lax1.he.net – 0 | 10 | 10 | 179 | 180 | 185 | 180 |
| 10gigabitethernet1-3.core1.lax2.he.net – 0 | 10 | 10 | 171 | 174 | 177 | 175 |
| 10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.phx2.he.net – 0 | 10 | 10 | 179 | 185 | 191 | 179 |
| it7-1-11.core1.phx2.he.net – 0 | 10 | 10 | 183 | 184 | 190 | 183 |
| v33.sioru.com – 0 | 10 | 10 | 190 | 191 | 194 | 191 |
| 162.211.225.146.16clouds.com – 0 | 10 | 10 | 170 | 171 | 176 | 171 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP – Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider

昨天晚上太晚了,加上我今天还在加班,所以I/O 跑分等我都还没来得急,晚点会补上给大家!

root@default:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 26
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 1133.354
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4533.41
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 26
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz
stepping : 5
cpu MHz : 1133.354
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4533.41
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

root@default:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 524288 kB
MemFree: 458992 kB
Cached: 35484 kB
Active: 22720 kB
Inactive: 37848 kB
Active(anon): 12340 kB
Inactive(anon): 12744 kB
Active(file): 10380 kB
Inactive(file): 25104 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
SwapTotal: 524288 kB
SwapFree: 524288 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 25084 kB
Shmem: 4100 kB
Slab: 4712 kB
SReclaimable: 1756 kB
SUnreclaim: 2956 kB

root@default:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-08-11 00:08:58– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 39.7M/s in 2.5s

2013-08-11 00:09:00 (39.7 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

root@default:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.00347 s, 215 MB/s

跑分:
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: default: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab079.5 — #1 SMP Fri Aug 2 17:16:15 MSK 2013
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″, collate=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
00:11:56 up 2:19, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 11 2013 00:11:56 – 00:40:07
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12278973.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2508.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3765.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 418433.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 120276.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1070824.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 703764.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 169047.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9792.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6116.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 780.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 584033.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12278973.1 1052.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2508.8 456.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 3765.9 875.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 418433.6 1056.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 120276.7 726.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1070824.2 1846.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 703764.1 565.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 169047.6 422.6
Process Creation 126.0 9792.9 777.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6116.8 1442.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 780.0 1299.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 584033.0 389.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 810.9

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 11 2013 00:40:07 – 01:10:43
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12240244.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4986.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3845.5 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 414331.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 114144.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1001938.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 687273.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 159114.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10412.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6307.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 805.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 581706.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12240244.0 1048.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4986.1 906.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 3845.5 894.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 414331.4 1046.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 114144.4 689.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1001938.3 1727.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 687273.4 552.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 159114.6 397.8
Process Creation 126.0 10412.6 826.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6307.6 1487.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 805.9 1343.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 581706.8 387.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 853.4

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: vpswz

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部