首页 vps测评 budgetvm测评|budgetvm openvz测评|budgetvm XEN测评

budgetvm测评|budgetvm openvz测评|budgetvm XEN测评

接下来主机测评放出budgetvm的两款VPS的测评数据,先是这款1024MB RAM,2048MB Burst Ram,80GB Raid 10 Disk,4 E5-2620 2Ghz Cpu,3000 GB Bandwidth,3 IP Addresses,$4.99/month (购买地址 )

budgetvm测评|budgetvm openvz测评|budgetvm XEN测评
接下来主机测评放出budgetvm的两款VPS的测评数据,先是这款1024MB RAM,2048MB Burst Ram,80GB Raid 10 Disk,4 E5-2620 2Ghz Cpu,3000 GB Bandwidth,3 IP Addresses,$4.99/month (购买地址 )

 

推荐大家看看:budgetvm在线第199天简单VPS测评,,budgetvm-新版SSD VPS简单测评   ,,budgetvm-128m内存openvz VPS测评,,budgetvm测评|budgetvm openvz测评|budgetvm XEN测评

 

如果你想了解budgetvm的全部产品,参看这里 budgetvm-正式开启支付宝付款
网络状况:说千兆端口,数据能说明问题:
budgetvm测评|budgetvm openvz测评|budgetvm XEN测评
硬盘I/O:个人觉着非常好了
budgetvm测评|budgetvm openvz测评|budgetvm XEN测评
UBI跑分:

Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation 1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: s1: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab059.7 — #1 SMP Tue Jul 24 19:12:01 MSK 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″, collate=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, In tel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, In tel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, In tel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, In tel virtualization
11:59:33 up 3 days, 22:22, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 30 2012 11:59:33 – 12:27:26
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10674486.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1899.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2233.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 306430.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 88675.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 841940.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 528914.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 76690.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4110.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3325.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1235.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 449477.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10674486.8 914.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1899.7 345.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 2233.7 519.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 306430.6 773.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 88675.3 535.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 841940.0 1451.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 528914.2 425.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 76690.8 191.7
Process Creation 126.0 4110.9 326.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3325.8 784.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1235.6 2059.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 449477.2 299.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 573.7

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 30 2012 12:27:26 – 12:55:25
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 37054335.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7316.0 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6884.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 344739.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 93343.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1028463.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1990870.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 272533.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14912.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9916.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1184.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1371876.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 37054335.2 3175.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7316.0 1330.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 6884.9 1601.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 344739.3 870.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 93343.5 564.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1028463.0 1773.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1990870.5 1600.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 272533.8 681.3
Process Creation 126.0 14912.3 1183.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9916.7 2338.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1184.1 1973.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1371876.4 914.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1335.1

再看20美元一年的128内存的XEN,洛杉矶

Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: neal: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem — #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:39:05 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
12:20:30 up 15:30, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 30 2012 12:20:30 – 12:48:26
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10758263.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1780.4 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1309.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 226203.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 62157.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 626523.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 399960.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 44070.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2401.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2328.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 292.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 450518.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10758263.4 921.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1780.4 323.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 1309.2 304.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 226203.9 571.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 62157.9 375.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 626523.8 1080.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 399960.3 321.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 44070.6 110.2
Process Creation 126.0 2401.6 190.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2328.4 549.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 292.5 487.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 450518.7 300.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 387.4

建议你看看https://www.zhujiceping.com/budgetvm-enzu/

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部