首页 vps测评 chicagovps简单测评/1.5g内存KVM VPS

chicagovps简单测评/1.5g内存KVM VPS

前几天发过文章“[推荐]chicagovps-512M内存Kvm/年付25$-支持windows”,主机测评花了7美元买了一个内存1.5G的KVM VPS,闲来无聊发个很简单的测评,本来是要unix benchmarks的,但是没yum就略过了,跑分无所谓啦,有下面这些估计也够了!
——————补上跑分——————–
在安装完debian之后直接TOP:

CPU的情况:
root@host:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

chicagovps简单测评/1.5g内存KVM VPS

chicagovps简单测评/1.5g内存KVM VPS
前几天发过文章“[推荐]chicagovps-512M内存Kvm/年付25$-支持windows”,主机测评花了7美元买了一个内存1.5G的KVM VPS,闲来无聊发个很简单的测评,本来是要unix benchmarks的,但是没yum就略过了,跑分无所谓啦,有下面这些估计也够了!
——————补上跑分——————–
在安装完debian之后直接TOP
chicagovps简单测评/1.5g内存KVM VPS
CPU的情况:
root@host:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
内存情况:
root@host:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 1554236 kB
MemFree: 1506244 kB
Buffers: 5272 kB
Cached: 19392 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 14916 kB
Inactive: 15656 kB
Active(anon): 5964 kB
Inactive(anon): 156 kB
Active(file): 8952 kB
Inactive(file): 15500 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
HighTotal: 661500 kB
HighFree: 632236 kB
LowTotal: 892736 kB
LowFree: 874008 kB
SwapTotal: 1748988 kB
SwapFree: 1748988 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 5956 kB
Mapped: 4312 kB
Shmem: 180 kB
Slab: 7960 kB
SReclaimable: 2172 kB
SUnreclaim: 5788 kB
KernelStack: 576 kB
PageTables: 380 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 2526104 kB
Committed_AS: 37756 kB
VmallocTotal: 122880 kB
VmallocUsed: 2432 kB
VmallocChunk: 119840 kB
HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
AnonHugePages: 0 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
DirectMap4k: 8184 kB
DirectMap2M: 903168 kB
硬盘情况:
root@host:~# df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rootfs 38G 612M 36G 2% /
udev 10M 0 10M 0% /dev
tmpfs 152M 176K 152M 1% /run
/dev/disk/by-uuid/474c7db1-969d-424c-8f37-c4d7a40c68e7 38G 612M 36G 2% /
tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 646M 0 646M 0% /run/shm

WGET,下载测速
root@host:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-07-30 02:05:46– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 26.7M/s in 3.9s

2013-07-30 02:05:51 (25.5 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

DD情况:这I/O估计在高峰期:
root@host:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 32.8361 s, 32.7 MB/s

跑分:

Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 03 2013 08:23:18 – 08:51:11
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12499274.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2071.0 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1704.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 414820.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 112624.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1041196.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 630831.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 152566.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4868.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4814.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1867.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 716218.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12499274.6 1071.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2071.0 376.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 1704.9 396.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 414820.4 1047.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112624.0 680.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1041196.1 1795.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 630831.2 507.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 152566.9 381.4
Process Creation 126.0 4868.7 386.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4814.6 1135.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1867.7 3112.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 716218.7 477.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 737.3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 03 2013 08:51:11 – 09:19:05
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 49046504.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8265.6 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 10166.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 422165.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 106321.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1133379.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2430969.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 547457.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 28901.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16622.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2445.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2494281.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 49046504.2 4202.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8265.6 1502.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 10166.3 2364.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 422165.5 1066.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 106321.9 642.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1133379.7 1954.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2430969.9 1954.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 547457.7 1368.6
Process Creation 126.0 28901.5 2293.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16622.3 3920.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2445.3 4075.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2494281.7 1662.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1962.2

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: vpswz

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部