首页 vps测评 cloudive简单测评-[2g内存/月付7刀]

cloudive简单测评-[2g内存/月付7刀]

主机测评(gongyi)买了个cloudive家的特价版2G内存的KVM VPS[cloudive-2g内存KVM/50g硬盘/1T流量/月付7刀],数据中心在芝加哥。主机测评推荐给各位看官,性价比对得起观众!

cloudive简单测评-[2g内存/月付7刀]
主机测评(gongyi)买了个cloudive家的特价版2G内存的KVM VPS[cloudive-2g内存KVM/50g硬盘/1T流量/月付7刀],数据中心在芝加哥。主机测评推荐给各位看官,性价比对得起观众!

cloudive简单测评-[2g内存/月付7刀]

广州联通6M下载http://172.245.38.4/1000MB.test:
cloudive简单测评-[2g内存/月付7刀]< |——————————————————————————————| | WinMTR statistics | | Host – % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last | |————————————————|——|——|——|——|——|——| | No response from host – 100 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | No response from host – 100 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 219.136.206.97 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 3 | | 183.56.32.129 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 6 | 99 | 2 | | 183.56.31.9 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 10 | 99 | 31 | | 61.144.3.2 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 4 | | 202.97.33.230 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 2 | | 202.97.60.42 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 4 | | 202.97.50.98 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 165 | 179 | 240 | 165 | | 202.97.90.26 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 154 | 158 | 183 | 183 | | xe-6-0-0.ar1.lax2.us.nlayer.net – 0 | 34 | 34 | 162 | 166 | 202 | 166 | | ae1-80g.cr1.lax1.us.nlayer.net – 8 | 25 | 23 | 162 | 166 | 221 | 162 | | xe-2-2-1.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net – 0 | 34 | 34 | 210 | 222 | 257 | 210 | | as23352.ae6-102.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net – 0 | 34 | 34 | 210 | 212 | 255 | 212 | | ae4.cr2.ord6.us.scnet.net – 0 | 34 | 34 | 211 | 243 | 313 | 214 | | 72.ae2.ar1.ord6.us.scnet.net – 0 | 34 | 34 | 211 | 224 | 248 | 213 | | as36352.xe-0-1-0.ar1.ord6.us.scnet.net – 0 | 34 | 34 | 219 | 242 | 306 | 221 | |10ge-1-3-1.ga146.cr1.chi.colocrossing.com – 0 | 34 | 34 | 223 | 234 | 272 | 224 | | 172.245.38.4 – 0 | 34 | 34 | 220 | 220 | 224 | 221 | |________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______| WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP – Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider 看看CPU:
root@debian:~/lnmp1.0-full# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 0 @ 3.20GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 3200.000
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon re p_good pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx hyperv isor lahf_lm
bogomips : 6400.00
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 0 @ 3.20GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 3200.000
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 1
initial apicid : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cm pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_per p_good pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx isor lahf_lm
bogomips : 6400.00
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

查看下内存
root@debian:~/lnmp1.0-full# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 2060136 kB
MemFree: 39704 kB
Buffers: 47308 kB
Cached: 1796040 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 1080688 kB
Inactive: 803352 kB
Active(anon): 35736 kB
Inactive(anon): 5172 kB
Active(file): 1044952 kB
Inactive(file): 798180 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
SwapTotal: 2170872 kB
SwapFree: 2170872 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 40716 kB
Mapped: 12340 kB
Shmem: 216 kB
Slab: 119536 kB
SReclaimable: 111220 kB
SUnreclaim: 8316 kB
KernelStack: 640 kB
PageTables: 2224 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 3200940 kB
Committed_AS: 157724 kB
VmallocTotal: 34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed: 11948 kB
VmallocChunk: 34359721308 kB
HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
DirectMap4k: 7272 kB
DirectMap2M: 2088960 kB

硬盘情况
root@debian:~/lnmp1.0-full# df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda1 48G 3.9G 41G 9% /
tmpfs 1006M 0 1006M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 1002M 116K 1002M 1% /dev
tmpfs 1006M 0 1006M 0% /dev/shm
——————————————————————————
wget:

root@debian:~/lnmp1.0-full# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-08-11 20:35:41– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[================================================>] 104,857,600 63.9M/s in 1.6s

2013-08-11 20:35:43 (63.9 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
—————————————————————————–
DD

root@debian:~/lnmp1.0-full# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.9685 s, 76.9 MB/s
——————————————————————–
跑分

Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 11 2013 20:36:49 – 21:04:57
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30103404.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3896.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3256.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 824183.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 256001.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1836596.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2222548.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 339183.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8876.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6751.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1399.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4003991.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30103404.6 2579.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3896.4 708.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 3256.0 757.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 824183.4 2081.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 256001.8 1546.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1836596.0 3166.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2222548.3 1786.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 339183.6 848.0
Process Creation 126.0 8876.7 704.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6751.7 1592.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1399.4 2332.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4003991.0 2669.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1517.6

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 11 2013 21:04:57 – 21:33:07
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 59827412.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7695.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7525.3 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 812833.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 235438.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2381443.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4259108.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 665840.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 23476.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11455.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1570.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5429459.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 59827412.1 5126.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7695.8 1399.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 7525.3 1750.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 812833.4 2052.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 235438.7 1422.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2381443.7 4105.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4259108.9 3423.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 665840.5 1664.6
Process Creation 126.0 23476.6 1863.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11455.5 2701.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1570.2 2617.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5429459.2 3619.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2422.8

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部