首页 vps测评 crissic-简单测评(512m内存VPS)

crissic-简单测评(512m内存VPS)

crissic家的VPS够便宜了吧?资源给的也算不少了吧?性价比如何?主机测评这里简单的为大家揭晓答案,这里做一个crissic家的512M内存+2IP的年付15美元的VPS的测评(Crissic-15$年付/512内存/50g硬盘/2T流量[I/O提速]),有关数据均为晚上八点左右测评获得,有兴趣的自己研究一下。其实带宽很给力,只是不在西海岸而已,仅此而已!

crissic家的VPS够便宜了吧?资源给的也算不少了吧?性价比如何?主机测评这里简单的为大家揭晓答案,这里做一个crissic家的512M内存+2IP的年付15美元的VPS的测评(Crissic-15$年付/512内存/50g硬盘/2T流量[I/O提速]),有关数据均为晚上八点左右测评获得,有兴趣的自己研究一下。其实带宽很给力,只是不在西海岸而已,仅此而已!

crissic-简单测评(512m内存VPS)

top – 06:24:25 up 4:00, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 23 total, 1 running, 22 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.0 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni,100.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem: 524288 total, 31144 used, 493144 free, 0 buffers
KiB Swap: 524288 total, 0 used, 524288 free, 18508 cached

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 20 0 3120 1800 1304 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.23 init
2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd/5619
3 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper/5619
86 root 20 0 2388 804 620 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.02 upstart-udev-br
93 root 20 0 2356 984 720 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.01 udevd
128 root 20 0 2352 736 468 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 udevd
129 root 20 0 2352 736 468 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 udevd
244 root 20 0 2380 572 420 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 upstart-socket-
1878 root 20 0 6336 1056 624 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 sshd
1908 root 20 0 33844 1472 1084 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.00 rsyslogd
1953 root 20 0 10024 824 400 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 saslauthd
1954 root 20 0 10024 468 44 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 saslauthd
2106 root 20 0 9924 1636 540 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.36 sendmail-mta
2176 root 20 0 2460 852 680 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 xinetd
2210 root 20 0 5612 2648 1192 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.36 apache2
2213 www-data 20 0 5676 2580 1084 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.00 apache2
2254 root 20 0 2176 884 696 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.02 cron

root@zhujiceping:~# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 512 30 481 0 0 18
-/+ buffers/cache: 12 499
Swap: 512 0 512

root@zhujiceping:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5660 @ 2.80GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2799.912
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 12
core id : 0
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat epb dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5599.82
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5660 @ 2.80GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2799.912
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 12
core id : 1
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat epb dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5599.82
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5660 @ 2.80GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2799.912
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 12
core id : 2
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 4
initial apicid : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat epb dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 5599.82
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

root@zhujiceping:~# df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 50G 592M 50G 2% /
none 256M 4.0K 256M 1% /dev
none 52M 980K 51M 2% /run
none 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
none 205M 0 205M 0% /run/shm
none 100M 0 100M 0% /run/user

root@zhujiceping:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2014-03-02 06:26:33– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 40.2M/s in 2.5s

2014-03-02 06:26:36 (40.2 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

root@zhujiceping:~# wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin
–2014-03-02 06:27:14– http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin
Resolving speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (speedtest.tokyo.linode.com)… 106.187.96.148, 2400:8900::4b
Connecting to speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (speedtest.tokyo.linode.com)|106.187.96.148|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100MB-tokyo.bin’

100%[============================================>] 104,857,600 7.36M/s in 19s

2014-03-02 06:27:34 (5.15 MB/s) – `100MB-tokyo.bin’ saved [104857600/104857600]

root@zhujiceping:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.6289 s, 162 MB/s
root@zhujiceping:~#
root@zhujiceping:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.63933 s, 162 MB/s
root@zhujiceping:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.36573 s, 319 MB/s
root@zhujiceping:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.84036 s, 280 MB/s
root@zhujiceping:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 6.99733 s, 153 MB/s
root@zhujiceping:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.28787 s, 327 MB/s

root@zhujiceping:~# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O – -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5660 @ 2.80GHz
Number of cores : 3
CPU frequency : 2799.912 MHz
Total amount of ram : 512 MB
Total amount of swap : 512 MB
System uptime : 4:05,
Download speed from CacheFly: 36.3MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 35.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 14.7MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.54MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 10.7MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 9.58MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.33MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 14.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 16.1MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 36.6MB/s
I/O speed : 144 MB/s

Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 02 2014 06:43:31 – 07:11:49
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12803764.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3012.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2981.2 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 285942.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 104214.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 869059.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 833015.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 110731.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7816.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4131.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1001.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 654835.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12803764.4 1097.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3012.8 547.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 2981.2 693.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 285942.6 722.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 104214.3 629.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 869059.2 1498.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 833015.9 669.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 110731.1 276.8
Process Creation 126.0 7816.8 620.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4131.9 974.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1001.8 1669.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 654835.4 436.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 730.8

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 02 2014 07:11:49 – 07:40:15
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38164090.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8863.7 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 10527.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 379735.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 129558.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 998465.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2241001.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 444425.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 16213.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10164.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1425.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1697738.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38164090.3 3270.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8863.7 1611.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 10527.1 2448.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 379735.3 958.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 129558.1 782.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 998465.2 1721.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2241001.8 1801.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 444425.4 1111.1
Process Creation 126.0 16213.3 1286.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10164.9 2397.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1425.1 2375.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1697738.8 1131.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1597.7

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部