首页 vps测评 frontrangehosting 256M kvm简单测评

frontrangehosting 256M kvm简单测评

花了1.87美元买了一个月的frontrangehosting的KVM,配置:256M内存, 5G SSD Cached硬盘,500G月流量一个IPV4,托管在FDC家的丹佛数据中心,线路你懂的。下面简单的发布下测试结果:

frontrangehosting 256M kvm简单测评
花了1.87美元买了一个月的frontrangehosting的KVM,配置:256M内存, 5G SSD Cached硬盘,500G月流量一个IPV4,托管在FDC家的丹佛数据中心,线路你懂的。下面简单的发布下测试结果:

root@debian:~# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 248 65 183 0 2 32
-/+ buffers/cache: 30 218
Swap: 258 0 258

root@debian:~# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda1 4.7G 2.1G 2.4G 47% /
tmpfs 125M 0 125M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 121M 112K 120M 1% /dev
tmpfs 125M 0 125M 0% /dev/shm

root@debian:~# vmstat
procs ———–memory———- —swap– —–io—- -system– —-cpu—-
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 0 187412 2268 33776 0 0 43 1 26 18 0 1 99 0

root@debian:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 1
initial apicid : 1
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 2
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 3
initial apicid : 3
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

root@debian:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.48294 s, 308 MB/s

root@debian:~# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2012-12-09 01:44:30– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100mb.testâ€

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 21.7M/s in 4.8s

2012-12-09 01:44:35 (20.8 MB/s) – “100mb.testâ€
Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 7.25MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 18.2MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.15MB/s
Download speed from Linode, London, UK:
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 3.35MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 2.31MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.94MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 10.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 7.79MB/s

UB整体跑分:

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: debian: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686 — #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 09:49:36 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 3: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
01:46:25 up 7 min, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.06, 0.02; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Dec 09 2012 01:46:25 – 02:14:23
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 9487158.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1845.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1764.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 359889.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 98835.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 940955.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 713414.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 150489.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4195.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3163.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1044.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 652366.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9487158.9 813.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1845.2 335.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 1764.4 410.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 359889.4 908.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 98835.5 597.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 940955.6 1622.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 713414.0 573.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 150489.9 376.2
Process Creation 126.0 4195.9 333.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3163.8 746.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1044.7 1741.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 652366.2 434.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 631.2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Dec 09 2012 02:14:23 – 02:42:29
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34706148.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7080.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9271.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 332902.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 89508.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 744833.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2536075.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 572360.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22295.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12115.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1729.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2082694.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34706148.8 2974.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7080.3 1287.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 9271.3 2156.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 332902.7 840.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89508.7 540.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 744833.2 1284.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2536075.4 2038.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 572360.2 1430.9
Process Creation 126.0 22295.3 1769.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12115.5 2857.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1729.5 2882.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2082694.0 1388.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1601.4

======= Script description and score comparison: =======

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部