首页 vps测评 LeaseWeb kvm VPS简单测评

LeaseWeb kvm VPS简单测评

LeaseWeb是大牌IDC,不过价格也一向不是那么便宜,这不出了低端VPS,火速上个简单的测评结果给大家瞧瞧,测试环境:1核CPU,512M内存,40G硬盘,1000M端口,KVM。据网友反映,LeaseWeb的VPS只从购买了就没出过问题,就是说稳定性上面绝对是一流的,这也不枉他们的牌子。
CPU信息:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 2400.116
cache size : 4096 KB

——————————————————————————–
VMSTAT
procs ———–memory———- —swap– —–io—- -system– —-cpu—-
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 0 333732 10576 142044 0 0 30 448 24 22 0 0 99 1
—————————————————————————————————-
硬盘I/0
Classic Disk I/O test # 1 (dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest1 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.5211 s, 55.0 MB/s
I/O speed : 55.0 MB/s

LeaseWeb kvm VPS简单测评
LeaseWeb是大牌IDC,不过价格也一向不是那么便宜,这不出了低端VPS,火速上个简单的测评结果给大家瞧瞧,测试环境:1核CPU,512M内存,40G硬盘,1000M端口,KVM。据网友反映,LeaseWeb的VPS只从购买了就没出过问题,就是说稳定性上面绝对是一流的,这也不枉他们的牌子。
CPU信息:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 2400.116
cache size : 4096 KB

——————————————————————————–
VMSTAT
procs ———–memory———- —swap– —–io—- -system– —-cpu—-
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 0 333732 10576 142044 0 0 30 448 24 22 0 0 99 1
—————————————————————————————————-
硬盘I/0
Classic Disk I/O test # 1 (dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest1 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.5211 s, 55.0 MB/s
I/O speed : 55.0 MB/s

Classic Disk I/O test # 2 (dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest2 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 20.0954 s, 53.4 MB/s
I/O speed : 53.4 MB/s

Classic Disk I/O test # 3 (dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest3 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 17.1414 s, 62.6 MB/s
I/O speed : 62.6 MB/s

Advance Disk I/O test # 1
(dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest4 bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync)
1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 18.0245 s, 59.6 MB/s
I/O speed : 59.6 MB/s

Advance Disk I/O test # 2
(dd if=/dev/zero of=iotest5 bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync)
16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 17.8548 s, 60.1 MB/s
I/O speed : 60.1 MB/s
————————————————————————-
I/O PING
IOPing results

IOPing I/O test ( ioping -c 10 . 2>&1 )
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=1 time=3.9 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=2 time=0.8 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=3 time=0.9 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=4 time=0.7 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=5 time=0.8 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=6 time=0.7 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=7 time=0.8 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=8 time=1.0 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=9 time=0.9 ms
4096 bytes from . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root): request=10 time=0.9 ms

— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root) ioping statistics —
10 requests completed in 9013.2 ms, 882 iops, 3.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.7/1.1/3.9/0.9 ms
————————————————————

IOPing seek rate test ( ioping -RD . 2>&1 )

— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root) ioping statistics —
4125 requests completed in 3000.2 ms, 1549 iops, 6.0 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/0.6/52.3/1.2 ms
————————————————————

IOPing sequential test ( ioping -RL . 2>&1 )

— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root) ioping statistics —
869 requests completed in 3001.2 ms, 299 iops, 74.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 2.8/3.3/61.3/3.4 ms
————————————————————

IOPing cached test ( ioping -RC . 2>&1 )

— . (ext4 /dev/mapper/vg0-root) ioping statistics —
38867 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 412220 iops, 1610.2 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.1/0.0 ms

网络下载:
Network download test # 1
Download from Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
Got 38.2MB/s
Network download test # 2
Download from Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
Got 52.4MB/s
Network download test # 3
Download from Cachefly (http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test)
Got 64.1MB/s
Download from Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA (http://atlanta1.linode.com/100MB-atlanta.bin)
Got 596KB/s
Download from Linode, Dallas, TX, USA (http://dallas1.linode.com/100MB-dallas.bin)
Got 10.8MB/s
Download from Linode, Tokyo, JP (http://tokyo1.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin)
Got 5.12MB/s
Download from Linode, London, UK (http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin)
Got 7.81MB/s
Download from OVH, Paris, France (http://proof.ovh.net/files/100Mio.dat)
Got 10.9MB/s
Download from SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands (http://mirror.i3d.net/100mb.bin)
Got 9.06MB/s
Download from Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany (http://hetzner.de/100MB.iso)
Got 11.6MB/s
Download from iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia (http://ftp.iinet.net.au/test100MB.dat)
Got 4.03MB/s
Download from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA (http://mirror.leaseweb.com/speedtest/100mb.bin)
Got 12.4MB/s
Download from Softlayer, Singapore (http://speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Got 4.53MB/s
Download from Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA (http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Got 12.4MB/s
Download from Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA (http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Got 13.7MB/s
Download from Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA (http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip)
Got 51.4MB/s

UB跑分
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: LeaseWeb-KVM512: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686 — #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 16:04:25 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4800.2 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
17:04:57 up 53 min, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.12, 0.09; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 18 2013 17:04:57 – 17:33:14
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16182408.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2805.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5458.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 757001.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 202113.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1533667.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1280836.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 321468.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21415.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6987.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 893.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1162880.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16182408.0 1386.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 5458.3 1269.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 757001.8 1911.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 202113.5 1221.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1533667.8 2644.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1280836.2 1029.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 321468.0 803.7
Process Creation 126.0 21415.3 1699.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6987.3 1647.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 893.4 1489.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1162880.4 775.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1252.0

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 18 2013 17:33:14 – 18:01:30
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16165477.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2811.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5429.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 770767.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 202402.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1571321.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1279444.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 322174.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21003.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6911.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 893.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1164152.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16165477.2 1385.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2811.4 511.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 5429.9 1262.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 770767.5 1946.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 202402.8 1223.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1571321.9 2709.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1279444.7 1028.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 322174.9 805.4
Process Creation 126.0 21003.0 1666.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6911.5 1630.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 893.5 1489.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1164152.0 776.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1253.2

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部