首页 vps测评 LFCVPS简单测评

LFCVPS简单测评

测试时间10月17日凌晨一点开始对LFC进行测评,简单的看了下,整体说来性能一般,这可能与时间上的问题有关正是服务器使用高峰期。

LFCVPS简单测评

测试时间10月17日凌晨一点开始对LFC进行测评,简单的看了下,整体说来性能一般,这可能与时间上的问题有关正是服务器使用高峰期。

CPU型号 [4核] Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz | 频率:2000.000 | 二级缓存:15360 KB | Bogomips:4000.00 ×4
root@s1:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 45
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 2000.000
cache size      : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 4000.00
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 45
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 2000.000
cache size      : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 4000.00
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 2
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 45
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 2000.000
cache size      : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 4000.00
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 3
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 45
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 2000.000
cache size      : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 4000.00
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

内存:

root@s1:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:         253692 kB
MemFree:            3680 kB
Buffers:           22720 kB
Cached:           186064 kB
SwapCached:            0 kB
Active:            43316 kB
Inactive:         194664 kB
Active(anon):      15076 kB
Inactive(anon):    15276 kB
Active(file):      28240 kB
Inactive(file):   179388 kB
Unevictable:           0 kB
Mlocked:               0 kB
HighTotal:             0 kB
HighFree:              0 kB
LowTotal:         253692 kB
LowFree:            3680 kB
SwapTotal:        262136 kB
SwapFree:         262136 kB
Dirty:                16 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:         29200 kB
Mapped:            11308 kB
Shmem:              1152 kB
Slab:               8264 kB
SReclaimable:       5104 kB
SUnreclaim:         3160 kB
KernelStack:         672 kB
PageTables:          708 kB
NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
Bounce:                0 kB
WritebackTmp:          0 kB
CommitLimit:      388980 kB
Committed_AS:      98168 kB
VmallocTotal:     598008 kB
VmallocUsed:         844 kB
VmallocChunk:     597016 kB
HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
HugePages_Total:       0
HugePages_Free:        0
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
DirectMap4k:      262144 kB
DirectMap2M:           0 kB

DD硬盘I/O测试

root@s1:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.68346 s, 47.2 MB/s

下载测试:

–2012-10-16 01:18:09–  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 14.2M/s   in 6.8s

2012-10-16 01:18:16 (14.7 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

UBI整体跑分测试:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: s1.gongyi.net: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem — #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 05:03:32 UTC 2011
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
00:16:51 up  1:03,  1 user,  load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 16 2012 00:16:51 – 00:44:49
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       10932321.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1895.8 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1163.1 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        234370.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           60202.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        693669.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              377229.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  45395.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2093.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2823.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    797.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         378766.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   10932321.9    936.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1895.8    344.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1163.1    270.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     234370.5    591.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      60202.0    363.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     693669.5   1196.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     377229.3    303.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      45395.3    113.5
Process Creation                                126.0       2093.5    166.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2823.3    665.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        797.4   1329.0
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     378766.7    252.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         418.3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 16 2012 00:44:49 – 01:12:51
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       39795431.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     7496.1 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2735.0 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        243956.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           65188.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        866754.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1484160.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 138240.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3749.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6143.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    807.8 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1300660.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   39795431.0   3410.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7496.1   1362.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2735.0    636.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     243956.0    616.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      65188.8    393.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     866754.9   1494.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1484160.4   1193.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     138240.0    345.6
Process Creation                                126.0       3749.9    297.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6143.9   1449.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        807.8   1346.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1300660.2    867.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         882.3

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: vpswz

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部