首页 vps测评 lfcvps 1G/XEN 测评

lfcvps 1G/XEN 测评

LFCVPS在LET上简单的发布了一个促销,1G内存的XEN只要6.5刀,这实在是让人太不能淡定了,所以买了一个月付的。之前买过一个LFCVPS 256内存的,之前也有测评过(https://www.zhujiceping.com/lfcvps-ceping/),现在简单的放出一下这款1G内存的VPS的测评.关于lfcvps服务器的参数及LFCVPS介绍详细查看https://www.zhujiceping.com/lfcvps/
CPU:
root@x:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes avx hypervisor
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes avx hypervisor
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

lfcvps 1G/XEN 测评

LFCVPS在LET上简单的发布了一个促销,1G内存的XEN只要6.5刀,这实在是让人太不能淡定了,所以买了一个月付的。之前买过一个LFCVPS 256内存的,之前也有测评过(https://www.zhujiceping.com/lfcvps-ceping/),现在简单的放出一下这款1G内存的VPS的测评.关于lfcvps服务器的参数及LFCVPS介绍详细查看https://www.zhujiceping.com/lfcvps/
CPU:
root@x:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes avx hypervisor
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes avx hypervisor
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes avx hypervisor
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni pclmulqdq ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes avx hypervisor
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

内存:
root@:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 1031680 kB
MemFree: 602824 kB
Buffers: 30492 kB
Cached: 306256 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 122716 kB
Inactive: 284044 kB
Active(anon): 69900 kB
Inactive(anon): 1264 kB
Active(file): 52816 kB
Inactive(file): 282780 kB
Unevictable: 0 kB
Mlocked: 0 kB
HighTotal: 311304 kB
HighFree: 139380 kB
LowTotal: 720376 kB
LowFree: 463444 kB
SwapTotal: 1048568 kB
SwapFree: 1048568 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 70236 kB
Mapped: 12860 kB
Shmem: 1152 kB
Slab: 13796 kB
SReclaimable: 10608 kB
SUnreclaim: 3188 kB
KernelStack: 688 kB
PageTables: 844 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 1564408 kB
Committed_AS: 140192 kB
VmallocTotal: 122880 kB
VmallocUsed: 1228 kB
VmallocChunk: 121440 kB
HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
DirectMap4k: 737272 kB
DirectMap2M: 0 kB
root@gongyi:~#
root@gongyi:~# df lh
df: `lh’: No such file or direc”不可描述”y
df: no file systems processed
root@gongyi:~# df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/xvda1 25G 1.6G 22G 7% /
tmpfs 504M 0 504M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 494M 24K 494M 1% /dev
tmpfs 504M 4.0K 504M 1% /dev/shm

下载:
root@x:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2012-10-24 23:11:10– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[===============================================>] 104,857,600 16.5M/s in 5.3s

2012-10-24 23:11:15 (18.9 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

硬盘:
root@:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.34311 s, 50.2 MB/s

UBI整体性能跑分:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: gongyi: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem — #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 10:27:25 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
23:13:40 up 3:37, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 24 2012 23:13:40 – 23:41:39
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12284895.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1971.8 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1217.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 293454.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 75769.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 886066.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 453204.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 57717.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2298.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3475.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1103.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 490912.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12284895.2 1052.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1971.8 358.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 1217.2 283.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 293454.7 741.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 75769.0 457.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 886066.4 1527.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 453204.2 364.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 57717.2 144.3
Process Creation 126.0 2298.8 182.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3475.4 819.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1103.7 1839.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 490912.6 327.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 503.0

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 24 2012 23:41:39 – 00:09:39
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 48771509.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7893.6 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4540.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 287577.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 74388.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1022385.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1808447.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 221393.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8189.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9261.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1231.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1687862.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 48771509.1 4179.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7893.6 1435.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 4540.7 1056.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 287577.9 726.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74388.8 449.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1022385.7 1762.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1808447.0 1453.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 221393.1 553.5
Process Creation 126.0 8189.5 650.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9261.7 2184.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1231.3 2052.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1687862.3 1125.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1207.6

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: vpswz

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部