首页 vps测评 prometeus vps简单测试

prometeus vps简单测试

花了4.88欧元(42快人民币)买了LEB上2012年Q3排名第一的VPS供应商prometeus家的vps,参数:类型KVMSSD5
CPU: 2 Core, RAM: 512MB,Disk Space: 15GB SSD,Bandwidth: 2000 GB,SolusVM/KVM, 1x IPv4 & 2x IPv6, €4.88/Month, 要用优惠码: KOCT35!

花了4.88欧元(42快人民币)买了LEB上2012年Q3排名第一的VPS供应商prometeus家的vps,参数:类型KVMSSD5
CPU: 2 Core, RAM: 512MB,Disk Space: 15GB SSD,Bandwidth: 2000 GB,SolusVM/KVM, 1x IPv4 & 2x IPv6, €4.88/Month, 要用优惠码: KOCT35!

prometeus的硬盘dd测试:
prometeus vps简单测试
prometeus在国内的基本网络线路情况:
prometeus vps简单测试
prometeusde UBI综合跑分:
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Process Creation 1 2 3

2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: debian: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686 — #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 09:49:36 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (6784.6 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (6784.6 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
20:06:55 up 16 min, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Oct 07 2012 20:06:55 – 20:35:04
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21370427.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3469.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4819.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 826872.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 228522.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2129097.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1456818.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 342629.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8571.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6222.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2223.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1271075.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21370427.8 1831.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3469.5 630.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 4819.3 1120.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 826872.9 2088.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 228522.9 1380.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2129097.2 3670.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1456818.4 1171.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 342629.7 856.6
Process Creation 126.0 8571.8 680.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6222.3 1467.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2223.9 3706.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1271075.8 847.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1368.4

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Oct 07 2012 20:35:04 – 21:03:14
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40511391.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6763.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 13638.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1252883.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 322464.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3457591.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2823839.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 732809.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 48226.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17592.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2292.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2371524.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40511391.3 3471.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6763.3 1229.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 13638.2 3171.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1252883.8 3163.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 322464.0 1948.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3457591.5 5961.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2823839.4 2270.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 732809.6 1832.0
Process Creation 126.0 48226.3 3827.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17592.0 4149.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2292.4 3820.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2371524.8 1581.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2763.6
个人总结:性价比超高,512内存的KVM也就算6.35美元一个月,15G的SSD硬盘算是很不错了,还有2T的大流量,唯一的缺陷就是在国内访问速度实在是太慢了,要是针对欧洲或者美洲客户的还是挺好的,针对国内的话必须要加上CDN了。

有兴趣的可以去看看http://www.prometeus.net

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部