首页 vps测评 Regolithmedia KVM VPS简单测试

Regolithmedia KVM VPS简单测试

本款测评VPS的基本配置:操作系统: Debian 6.0 64-bit,CPU Cores: 2,IPv4 Address: 2 ,数据中心: Texas ,月流量: 500 GB @ 1Gbit port,硬盘: 5 GB ,内存: 128 MB,虚拟类型: KVM。

Regolithmedia KVM VPS简单测试

Regolithmedia KVM VPS简单测试
本款测评VPS的基本配置:操作系统: Debian 6.0 64-bit,CPU Cores: 2,IPv4 Address: 2 ,数据中心: Texas ,月流量: 500 GB @ 1Gbit port,硬盘: 5 GB ,内存: 128 MB,虚拟类型: KVM。

I/O Pings
ioping -c 10
request=1 time=0.2 ms
request=2 time=0.2 ms
request=3 time=149.4 ms
request=4 time=0.2 ms
request=5 time=0.2 ms
request=6 time=0.2 ms
request=7 time=0.2 ms
request=8 time=0.2 ms
request=9 time=0.2 ms
request=10 time=0.2 ms
10 requests completed in 9152.0 ms, 66 iops, 0.3 mb/s

I/O Seek Test (No Cache)
ioping -RD
6500 iops, 25.4 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/119.0/1.1 ms
I/O Reads – Sequential
ioping -RL
2175 iops, 543.8 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.3/0.5/33.8/0.6 ms
I/O Reads – Cached
ioping -RC
412132 iops, 1609.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.0/0.0 ms

DD
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
4.17254 s, 257 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
8.78025 s, 122 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
4.982 s, 216 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
10.1574 s, 106 MB/s

FIO
Read IOPS 639.0
Read Bandwidth 2.5 MB/second
Write IOPS 950.0
Write Bandwidth 3.8 MB/second

网络下载速度
Cachefly 62.9 MB/s
Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA 6.06 MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX, USA 60.3 MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 944 KB/s
Linode, London, UK 1.11 MB/s
OVH, Paris, France 787 KB/s
SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands 1.07 MB/s
Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany 1.09 MB/s
iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia 533 KB/s
Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA 843 KB/s
Softlayer, Singapore 482 KB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA 2.89 MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA 2.86 MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA 3.26 MB/s

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: regolith: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-amd64 — #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 10:07:46 UTC 2012
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″, collate=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (6385.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (6385.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
14:19:30 up 49 min, 1 user, load average: 0.15, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 23 2012 14:19:30 – 14:47:36
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34818623.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3802.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4437.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1211398.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 336108.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2734483.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2533436.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 452152.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11414.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10497.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2204.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4140165.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34818623.5 2983.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3802.9 691.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 4437.3 1031.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1211398.3 3059.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 336108.6 2030.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2734483.2 4714.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2533436.7 2036.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 452152.6 1130.4
Process Creation 126.0 11414.7 905.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10497.2 2475.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2204.5 3674.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4140165.3 2760.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1962.6

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 23 2012 14:47:36 – 15:15:44
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 69417568.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7597.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 10700.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1365634.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 358216.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3708125.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 5055668.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 877209.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 34341.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17146.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2259.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6486418.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 69417568.9 5948.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7597.1 1381.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 10700.1 2488.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1365634.5 3448.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 358216.0 2164.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3708125.9 6393.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5055668.0 4064.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 877209.9 2193.0
Process Creation 126.0 34341.5 2725.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17146.3 4043.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2259.2 3765.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6486418.0 4324.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3281.8

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部