首页 vps测评 smartvps(香港)简单测评

smartvps(香港)简单测评


下午在上班的时候QQ上面有自称来自smartvps的人加我,要我帮忙测评一下他们的VPS并发布在www.zhujiceping.com上,VPS由smartvps提供。本人说明一下:本次测评,仅代表个人观点;官方将测评过的VPS保留3个月的使用时间,我不也不差你这个VPS,别以为我拿了什么好处,所以大家就不用多想说我就写好看的…
VPS Pro就是官方的高级版:4核CPU,2G内存,4G突发,80G硬盘,1个IPV4,1个IPV6,不限流量,参看http://smartvps.cn/product.html

smartvps(香港)简单测评
下午在上班的时候QQ上面有自称来自smartvps的人加我,要我帮忙测评一下他们的VPS并发布在www.zhujiceping.com上,VPS由smartvps提供。本人说明一下:本次测评,仅代表个人观点;官方将测评过的VPS保留3个月的使用时间,我不也不差你这个VPS,别以为我拿了什么好处,所以大家就不用多想说我就写好看的…
VPS Pro就是官方的高级版:4核CPU,2G内存,4G突发,80G硬盘,1个IPV4,1个IPV6,不限流量,参看http://smartvps.cn/product.html

先说smartvps后台优点:简单、干净、易操作,再说缺点:操作系统之间的切换需要5分钟或者更长时间,重装系统也是一样。习惯了solusvm的你习惯么?一键搞定的事儿分了两次!

smartvps(香港)简单测评

smartvps(香港)简单测评

【1】安装lnmp.org的一键环境包,整个过程从19:57分开始,20:53分结束!

【2】安装完成后没做任何动作,看TOP结果:
smartvps(香港)简单测评

【3】CPU
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 798.843
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips : 5027.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 798.843
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips : 5027.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 798.843
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 2
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips : 5027.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 798.843
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips : 5027.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

【4】内存
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 4194304 kB
MemFree: 4072484 kB
Buffers: 0 kB
Cached: 0 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 0 kB
Inactive: 0 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 4194304 kB
LowFree: 4072484 kB
SwapTotal: 0 kB
SwapFree: 0 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 0 kB
Mapped: 0 kB
Slab: 0 kB
PageTables: 0 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 0 kB
Committed_AS: 0 kB
VmallocTotal: 0 kB
VmallocUsed: 0 kB
VmallocChunk: 0 kB

【5】硬盘
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 80G 1.7G 79G 3% /
tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /lib/init/rw
tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /dev/shm

【6】硬盘I/O
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 23.2459 s, 46.2 MB/s

【7】WGET下载
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-01-31 21:07:16– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 204.93.150.151
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|204.93.150.151|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[=============================================>] 104,857,600 847K/s in 2m 29s

2013-01-31 21:09:45 (688 KB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
补充一下下载腾讯QQ软件的数据
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# wget http://dl_dir.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ2012/QQ2012.exe
–2013-01-31 21:09:53– http://dl_dir.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ2012/QQ2012.exe
Resolving dl_dir.qq.com… 205.177.133.137, 205.177.133.130, 205.177.133.131, …
Connecting to dl_dir.qq.com|205.177.133.137|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 56800672 (54M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `QQ2012.exe’

100%[=============================================>] 56,800,672 899K/s in 62s

2013-01-31 21:10:55 (896 KB/s) – `QQ2012.exe’ saved [56800672/56800672]

【8】UBI综合跑分

Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation 1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: hkg-vps-srv004: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6xen — #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:35:38 MSD 2010
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″, collate=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz (5027.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz (5027.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz (5027.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz (5027.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
21:17:09 up 1:31, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.16; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 31 2013 21:17:09 – 21:45:06
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 8434556.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1403.8 MWIPS (8.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 692.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 130124.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 39203.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 434664.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 187112.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 16997.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2050.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1563.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 255.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 168994.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 8434556.7 722.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1403.8 255.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 692.7 161.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 130124.6 328.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 39203.8 236.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 434664.7 749.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 187112.4 150.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 16997.0 42.5
Process Creation 126.0 2050.9 162.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1563.8 368.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 255.7 426.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 168994.3 112.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 237.3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 31 2013 21:45:06 – 22:16:16
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10952249.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4569.3 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1112.2 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 112350.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 29832.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 356544.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 271601.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 71379.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2751.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1880.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 252.4 lpm (60.6 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 230981.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10952249.3 938.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4569.3 830.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 1112.2 258.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 112350.0 283.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 29832.2 180.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 356544.7 614.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 271601.5 218.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 71379.4 178.4
Process Creation 126.0 2751.0 218.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1880.9 443.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 252.4 420.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 230981.0 154.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 328.0

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部