首页 vps测评 urpad VPS简单测评(19美元/年/VZ/768M内存)

urpad VPS简单测评(19美元/年/VZ/768M内存)

urpad默认探针上面是看不到一些信息的,有人问我为啥看不到我不知道说啥了。前天urpad19刀年付的768M内存的VPS,估计大家都会说这么便宜资源给这么多,估计是超售到烂到家了,但是我告诉你DD还有差不多70M,而且端口貌似不是你想的10M或者100,不多说,我这里放出个简单的测评。
硬盘I/O简单测试:
root@x:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 15.773 s, 68.1 MB/s

——————————————————————————–
看看CPU
root@x:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 1600.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6800.39
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

urpad VPS简单测评(19美元/年/VZ/768M内存)

urpad VPS简单测评(19美元/年/VZ/768M内存)
urpad默认探针上面是看不到一些信息的,有人问我为啥看不到我不知道说啥了。前天urpad19刀年付的768M内存的VPS,估计大家都会说这么便宜资源给这么多,估计是超售到烂到家了,但是我告诉你DD还有差不多70M,而且端口貌似不是你想的10M或者100,不多说,我这里放出个简单的测评。
硬盘I/O简单测试:
root@x:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 15.773 s, 68.1 MB/s

——————————————————————————–
看看CPU
root@x:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 1600.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6800.39
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 1600.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6800.39
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 1600.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 2
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 4
initial apicid : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6800.39
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 1600.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 6
initial apicid : 6
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6800.39
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
———————————————————————
网络下载测试:
root@x:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-01-23 20:01:50– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 39.8M/s in 2.5s

2013-01-23 20:01:53 (39.8 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
—————————————————————————————–
看看跑分吧:
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation 1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: : GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab068.8 — #1 SMP Fri Dec 7 17:06:14 MSK 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6800.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6800.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6800.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6800.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
20:02:55 up 22:06, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Jan 23 2013 20:02:55 – 20:30:59
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 24899342.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3741.9 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2669.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 846347.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 228924.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2227752.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1290800.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 111758.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8541.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5521.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2931.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 985113.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24899342.3 2133.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3741.9 680.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 2669.2 620.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 846347.9 2137.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 228924.8 1383.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2227752.6 3841.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1290800.5 1037.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 111758.6 279.4
Process Creation 126.0 8541.1 677.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5521.0 1302.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2931.0 4885.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 985113.4 656.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1194.0

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Jan 23 2013 20:30:59 – 20:59:08
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 81922974.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 13857.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 24610.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1181544.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 315502.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3471340.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4410355.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1001327.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 41054.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 26388.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4127.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3299501.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 81922974.9 7020.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13857.9 2519.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 24610.5 5723.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1181544.3 2983.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 315502.0 1906.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3471340.0 5985.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4410355.6 3545.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1001327.7 2503.3
Process Creation 126.0 41054.3 3258.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 26388.7 6223.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4127.6 6879.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3299501.8 2199.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3811.0

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部