首页 vps测评 vpsunlimited 512M内存(xen)VPS简单测评

vpsunlimited 512M内存(xen)VPS简单测评

晚上八点左右下单买了vpsunlimited.com的这款512内存的VPS,是基于XEN,location是los angeles的QR机房,25G硬盘,500G流量,一个IPV4,首月付款2.99刀,次月续费8.99刀,基于这一点我就先买了一个试试,如果还行我就下个月再继续续费。下面上张环境编译完成后的图:

晚上八点左右下单买了vpsunlimited.com的这款512内存的VPS,是基于XEN,location是los angeles的QR机房,25G硬盘,500G流量,一个IPV4,首月付款2.99刀,次月续费8.99刀,基于这一点我就先买了一个试试,如果还行我就下个月再继续续费。下面上张环境编译完成后的图:

vpsunlimited 512M内存(xen)VPS简单测评

下面给出简单的vpsunlimited.com家这款512M内存的VPS的测评数据:

先看硬盘I/O,个人觉得还凑合,主要是晚上十点测试的也算是老外的高峰期了吧?
root@vps:/# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.5251 s, 59.3 MB/s

网络下载测速,100M端口没什么好说的了。
root@vps:/# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2012-12-01 22:16:33– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’
100%[=====================================================>] 104,857,600 9.75M/s in 10s
2012-12-01 22:16:44 (9.78 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

然后看看CPU,说的是4核,看了下CPU没有限制频率,这样好坏处都有;
root@vps:/# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.084
cache size : 12288 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4800.16
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.084
cache size : 12288 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4800.16
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.084
cache size : 12288 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4800.16
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.084
cache size : 12288 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4800.16
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

最后来个UB跑分吧,还凑合吧:
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: vps.server.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem — #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 05:03:32 UTC 2011
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.2 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.2 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.2 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.2 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
22:20:36 up 1:04, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.14; runlevel 2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Dec 01 2012 22:20:36 – 22:48:57
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 14278317.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2466.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1618.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 330560.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 85048.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 907742.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 529771.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 70377.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2942.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4035.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1127.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 526614.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14278317.6 1223.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2466.3 448.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 1618.0 376.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 330560.5 834.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 85048.0 513.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 907742.3 1565.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 529771.8 425.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 70377.2 175.9
Process Creation 126.0 2942.8 233.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4035.6 951.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1127.6 1879.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 526614.1 351.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 582.4

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Dec 01 2012 22:48:57 – 23:17:20
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 56795644.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9860.1 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4012.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 332475.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 88545.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1125758.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2117652.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 205978.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5381.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8984.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1201.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1882265.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 56795644.2 4866.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9860.1 1792.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 4012.7 933.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 332475.5 839.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 88545.0 535.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1125758.4 1941.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2117652.6 1702.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 205978.3 514.9
Process Creation 126.0 5381.0 427.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8984.8 2119.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1201.9 2003.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1882265.1 1254.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1247.1

chinaz的超级ping
vpsunlimited 512M内存(xen)VPS简单测评

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部