admin
晚上八点左右下单买了vpsunlimited.com的这款512内存的VPS，是基于XEN，location是los angeles的QR机房,25G硬盘，500G流量，一个IPV4，首月付款2.99刀，次月续费8.99刀，基于这一点我就先买了一个试试，如果还行我就下个月再继续续费。下面上张环境编译完成后的图：
下面给出简单的vpsunlimited.com家这款512M内存的VPS的测评数据：
先看硬盘I/O，个人觉得还凑合，主要是晚上十点测试的也算是老外的高峰期了吧？
root@vps:/# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.5251 s, 59.3 MB/s
网络下载测速，100M端口没什么好说的了。
root@vps:/# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2012-12-01 22:16:33– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’
100%[=====================================================>] 104,857,600 9.75M/s in 10s
2012-12-01 22:16:44 (9.78 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
然后看看CPU，说的是4核，看了下CPU没有限制频率，这样好坏处都有；
root@vps:/# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.084
cache size : 12288 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4800.16
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.084
cache size : 12288 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4800.16
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.084
cache size : 12288 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4800.16
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.084
cache size : 12288 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4800.16
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
最后来个UB跑分吧，还凑合吧：
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: vps.server.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem — #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 05:03:32 UTC 2011
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.2 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.2 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.2 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4800.2 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
22:20:36 up 1:04, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.14; runlevel 2
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Dec 01 2012 22:20:36 – 22:48:57
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 14278317.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2466.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1618.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 330560.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 85048.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 907742.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 529771.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 70377.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2942.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4035.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1127.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 526614.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14278317.6 1223.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2466.3 448.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 1618.0 376.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 330560.5 834.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 85048.0 513.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 907742.3 1565.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 529771.8 425.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 70377.2 175.9
Process Creation 126.0 2942.8 233.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4035.6 951.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1127.6 1879.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 526614.1 351.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 582.4
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Dec 01 2012 22:48:57 – 23:17:20
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 56795644.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9860.1 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4012.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 332475.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 88545.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1125758.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2117652.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 205978.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5381.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8984.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1201.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1882265.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 56795644.2 4866.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9860.1 1792.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 4012.7 933.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 332475.5 839.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 88545.0 535.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1125758.4 1941.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2117652.6 1702.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 205978.3 514.9
Process Creation 126.0 5381.0 427.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8984.8 2119.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1201.9 2003.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1882265.1 1254.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1247.1
chinaz的超级ping
