首页 vps测评 vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

vultr,被称作是digitalocean killer,这意思很明显吧?主机测评这里岂能错过这么碉堡的VPS,速度上了一个vultr,选的是芝加哥数据中心,配置为512M内存,1核CPU,20gSSD硬盘,安装的是centos 6 64位系统,在没有做任何处理的情况下我先做个简单的测评给大家看看,后面会补图。

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

vultr,被称作是digitalocean killer,这意思很明显吧?主机测评这里岂能错过这么碉堡的VPS,速度上了一个vultr,选的是芝加哥数据中心,配置为512M内存,1核CPU,20gSSD硬盘,安装的是centos 6 64位系统,在没有做任何处理的情况下我先做个简单的测评给大家看看,后面会补图。

官方网站http://www.vultr.com

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

先看什么虚拟类型?
[root@SRVID5916 virt-what-1.12]# virt-what
kvm

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

TOP看看空转情况:
top – 08:37:46 up 37 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 64 total, 1 running, 63 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 502272k total, 78672k used, 423600k free, 4900k buffers
Swap: 1015800k total, 0k used, 1015800k free, 30560k cached

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 20 0 19232 1484 1220 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.27 init
2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd
3 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0
4 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0
5 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0
6 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0
7 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.07 events/0
8 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cgroup
9 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper
10 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 netns

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

 

内存没啥可说的
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 490 76 413 0 4 29
-/+ buffers/cache: 42 448
Swap: 991 0 991

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

CPU这里可以确切的告诉我们是Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 60
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 3292.376
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc up arch_perfmon rep_good unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm xsaveopt fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm
bogomips : 6584.75
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

20G SSD硬盘,还好
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda1 19G 792M 18G 5% /
tmpfs 246M 0 246M 0% /dev/shm

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

芝加哥数据中心,真尼玛碉堡
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2014-02-23 08:39:24– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100mb.test”

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 110M/s in 0.9s

2014-02-23 08:39:25 (110 MB/s) – “100mb.test” saved [104857600/104857600]

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

测试下载日本数据中心的文件:
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin
–2014-02-23 08:39:47– http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin
Resolving speedtest.tokyo.linode.com… 106.187.96.148, 2400:8900::4b
Connecting to speedtest.tokyo.linode.com|106.187.96.148|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100MB-tokyo.bin”

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 8.81M/s in 13s

2014-02-23 08:40:01 (7.49 MB/s) – “100MB-tokyo.bin” saved [104857600/104857600]

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

测试下载英国数据中心的文件:
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin
–2014-02-23 08:40:30– http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin
Resolving speedtest.london.linode.com… 176.58.107.39, 2a01:7e00::4b
Connecting to speedtest.london.linode.com|176.58.107.39|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100MB-london.bin”

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 15.9M/s in 7.3s

2014-02-23 08:40:38 (13.7 MB/s) – “100MB-london.bin” saved [104857600/104857600]

I/O能不能变动下啊?这不科学啊,我这真不是多复制了几次:
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.25246 s, 477 MB/s
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.24974 s, 477 MB/s
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.24997 s, 477 MB/s
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.25054 s, 477 MB/s
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.24889 s, 477 MB/s
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.25146 s, 477 MB/s

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

用别人的脚本告诉你这机房的网络条件真心好,我擦:
[root@SRVID5916 ~]# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O – -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 3292.376 MHz
Total amount of ram : 490 MB
Total amount of swap : 991 MB
System uptime : 42 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 107MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 70.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 44.6MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.60MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 11.5MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.9MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.14MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 27.9MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 21.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 51.9MB/s
I/O speed : 477 MB/s

vultr测评(512m内存,芝加哥)

你要说1核CPU跑出2405分,我真不信,但是尼玛:
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: SRVID5916: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Wed Feb 12 00:41:43 UTC 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz (6584.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
08:50:27 up 50 min, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 23 2014 08:50:27 – 09:18:29
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 43641489.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4470.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7612.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1659346.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 445454.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3840036.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3041636.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 541192.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 23927.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8543.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1153.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5754255.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43641489.8 3739.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4470.1 812.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 7612.6 1770.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1659346.0 4190.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 445454.0 2691.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3840036.4 6620.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3041636.4 2445.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 541192.6 1353.0
Process Creation 126.0 23927.2 1899.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8543.0 2014.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1153.1 1921.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5754255.2 3836.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2405.3

免责声明:文章内容不代表本站立场,本站不对其内容的真实性、完整性、准确性给予任何担保、暗示和承诺,仅供读者参考,文章版权归原作者所有。如本文内容影响到您的合法权益(内容、图片等),请及时联系本站,我们会及时删除处理。

作者: admin

为您推荐

profitserver:简单测评下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS

profitserver,俄罗斯公司,运作着多个数据中心的VPS,这里给大家测试下荷兰阿姆斯特丹机房的VPS的实际使用情况,希望对那些想买荷兰vps、想买抗投诉、不限流量等vps的大兄弟一个简单的参考。虽然是实测数据,但是还是提示一句:仅供参考!

Virmach怎么样?亚特兰大机房AMD Ryzen系列VPS简单测评

virmach的亚特兰大数据中心的新型AMD RYZEN系列VPS正式上面开卖了,是现货哦,不是预售。虽然不少国人热衷于美国西海岸,但是也有一些不喜欢挤在一起的国内用户也喜欢东海岸。这里,主机测评弄了个最低配的virmach家的亚特兰大AMD系列vps,分享点实测的数据,看完大家就知道virmach怎么样,virmach亚特兰大是否适合自己了。

测评下Virmach家西海岸热门圣何塞机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach美国vps的西海岸热门数据中心要么洛杉矶要么就圣何塞啦,最近virmach的圣何塞AMD系列又已经正式铺货(非预售了),那么效果怎么样?速度好不好?性能是否给力?主机测评这里开了个小鸡给大家做个简单测评,直接公布实测数据,好不好大家看数据就知道了。

大致测评下Virmach的西雅图机房的AMD系列VPS

virmach的西雅图的AMD Ryzen系列VPS已经正式铺货开卖(非预售的形式),作为西海岸的常见节点,那么virmach的西雅图vps到底怎么样呢?速度好不好?性能是否有AMD+NVMe期待的那么给力呢? 主机测评这里弄了个小鸡给大家做个简单的测评,通过数据大家可以得知大致的情况。

Linode怎么样?[2022年]Linode印度云服务器简单测评分享

linode的亚太数据中心里面就包含有印度,那linode印度云服务器怎么样呢?根据以往的经验,至少站长是没有见过几个直连来中国大陆的印度vps。由于linode有着较高的知名度,我们这里还是对linode印度vps做个简单的测评吧,让大家看看实际情况是怎么样的。

发表评论

返回顶部